Home › Forums › General Transport Discussion › Project Oval PAYG expansion
Tagged: Oval
- This topic has 20 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 2 months, 3 weeks ago by Si Hollett.
-
AuthorPosts
-
04/07/2023 at 08:49 #4974Si HollettParticipant
The DfT have published the list of Phase 1 stations this morning. These will have PAYG by the end of the year, with a lot more to follow next year.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/53-train-stations-to-benefit-from-tap-in-tap-out-rollout
The list is alphabetical, I’ve reformatted it below by route (some stations listed twice):
West Horndon, Laindon, Basildon, Pitsea, Benfleet, Leigh-on-Sea, Chalkwell, Westcliff, Southend Central, Southend East, Thorpe Bay, Shoeburyness
Tilbury Town, East Tilbury, Stanford-le-Hope, Pitsea
Eynsford, Shoreham (Kent), Otford, Bat & Ball, Sevenoaks
Dunton Green, Sevenoaks
Kempton Park, Sunbury, Upper Halliford, Shepperton
Ashford (Surrey), Staines, Egham, Virginia Water
Ashford (Surrey), Staines, Wraysbury, Sunnymeads, Datchet, Windsor & Eton Riverside
Denham, Denham Golf Club, Gerrards Cross, Seer Green & Jordans, Beaconsfield, High Wycombe
Kings Langley, Apsley, Hemel Hempstead, Berkhamsted, Tring, Cheddington, Leighton Buzzard, Bletchley
Watford North, Garston, Bricket Wood, How Wood, Park Street, St Albans Abbey
05/07/2023 at 03:37 #4975MikeModeratorThanks Si,
I will be covering this shortly in more detail, but that’s useful to have it by line rather than alphabetical.
22/11/2023 at 09:53 #5230Si HollettParticipantOne question that there is no information about is OSIs. Several towns in the Project Oval scope are (were?) treated with interchange maps on the NR website showing walking routes both stations. Hertford is one of these towns, but doesn’t have an OSI despite both stations being PAYG – probably the stations are rather far apart and deemed too far for an OSI (plus the route up to Stevenage not being included makes it less useful as an interchange). St Albans is likely in a similar boat – too far apart to bother with.
Windsor, and in phase 2, Dorking, however, have the stations fairly close and are very much ‘potential OSIs’ – but there’s no news as to whether they will be. While Dorking is a little way off, Windsor is just 11 days away.
Edenbridge Town and Farnborough stations were late additions to the phase 2 scope, added due to nearby stations being inside the scope – so perhaps they have done some thinking about this. And it’s not due to station groups – else Reading West would be added as it’s the same group as Reading (then again, perhaps that’s a separate scheme as the station is being overhauled and upgraded).
22/11/2023 at 19:55 #5231FeathersParticipantGiven that fares in these areas are purely dictated by the train operating companies (I believe), I think the chances of anything ‘new’ being introduced is unlikely. I don’t really see GWR and SWR agreeing to reduce the fares they charge just because people walk between the stations.
I look forward to being proved wrong, of course.
- This reply was modified 1 year ago by Feathers.
22/11/2023 at 23:54 #5236MikeModeratorIt may depend on whether there are any fares priced with the walking interchanges in mind. Ware to Bayford is only available via London, meaning that if you wanted to make the journey via Hertford you’d need two tickets, or two PAYG fares. Ware to Stevenage is available via Hertford, but it may depend on whether the fare is different to the sum of the two singles. The same consideration will apply to other pairs. If the train companies want through fares to be available using PAYG and those interchanges, they’ll have to ask TfL to set up new OSIs.
23/11/2023 at 13:15 #5237Si HollettParticipantNational Rail Enquiries routes Slough – Richmond via Windsor so there is definitely a walking interchange there.
Slough – Windsor anytime single is £3.40. Windsor – Richmond anytime single is £9.00*. £11.00 for a Slough-Richmond anytime single is cheaper than individual singles.
However TfL offers a route that takes slightly longer via Turnham Green that is £4.00, so I doubt people would use the Windsor interchange for this particular journey! Slough – Staines though…
*I’m doing 14th of December for these prices – this ticket today is £9.30, so Oval has lowered fares.
24/11/2023 at 17:45 #5245Miles ThomasParticipantFor clarity, St Albans City already supports contactless, as does many other stations on the north end of the (original) Thameslink, at least as far as Luton (ISTR).
City to Abbey is indeed borderline for an OSI type arrangement, knocking on for a 20 minute walk (1.25 miles, Google maps says 30 but I think that’s generous). But maybe should be allowable in case of disruption on Thameslink.
I wonder if there are plans (or a date) when the capability is extended to Woking (Southwest Main line–last contactless point currently is Surbiton I think) and Chelmsford or maybe Sudbury/ Marks Tey/ Colchester / Ipswich.
24/11/2023 at 18:01 #5246MikeModeratorLuton Airport Parkway is the current limit of contactless on the Midland Mainline.
Phase 1 of Project Oval will be ready, from a software point of view, on December 3rd. The actual golive date is being controlled by the DfT who will probably want to make a big bang announcement. Currently they say by the end of this year.
Phase 2 is likely to be sometime next year, or even 2025, given that phase 1 was supposed to be ready earlier this year. That will include SWML to Farborough and GEML to Witham according to current plans. These do change from time to time though.
- This reply was modified 1 year ago by Mike.
24/11/2023 at 18:29 #5248MikeModeratorAlso to Si,
I’m aware that train companies are revising fares for the introduction of contactless. It seems that normal fares are being aligned with PAYG, including singles being half of the appropriate return. SWR are also abolishing their evening and Sunday fares on lines with contactless.
20/08/2024 at 16:21 #6264John SaynorParticipantI’m Vice-Chair of Darent Valley Community Rail Partnership, and Southeastern has told us that Contactless will be extended to stations on the lines to Sevenoaks on 22 September, as part of Project OVAL. The readers and associated equipment have been installed and running for over a year now (fyi they incorporate Cisco hardware among other things). Stations covered are Eynsford, Shoreham (Kent), Otford, Bat & Ball, Sevenoaks and Dunton Green. This forum looks like a good place to post information about this route and others as contactless is implemented. The implementation is long delayed, so we don’t know if it will happen on the 22nd.
20/08/2024 at 16:47 #6265John SaynorParticipantAs part of project Oval, new cash fares have been implemented on all lines affected by contactless expansion, in order match the new contactless fares. There are new peak and offpeak single fares. This has good and bad effects.
The good news is that single fares are cheaper. Instead of the old practice that a single was more or less the same price as an offpeak day return, the new offpeak single is now half the day return fare.These cash single fares are the same as the contactless fares, which are shown on brfares.com.
The bad news is that the TfL system of treating a journey out of London between 16:00-19:00 as ‘peak’ means that an offpeak trip to London returning between 16:00-19:00 is more expensive. Moreover this applies to all journeys – including local journeys where you travelling away from London in the peak. You can still buy a cash offpeak return, but it’s not valid at those times. I wonder how many innocent people have been caught in this trap. And unlike on the tube, the difference in price between offpeak and peak fares can be large.
The only way round this is to buy an offpeak return to London with Travelcard, which does allow return anytime after 09.30 M-F.
Finally, a positive feature of Oval is that the cash single fares are the same as the contactless fares – unlike the Tube, Lizzie and earlier contactless implementations. In the latter cases, the choice is between a contactless offpeak fare and an anytime cash single fare at a much higher price. This means that discounting the cash fare with a railcard often leaves you with a ticket that’s more expensive than a contactless fare (which cannot be discounted using a railcard).
From what I can see, the above applies to all of the lines to which contactless is being extended.
20/08/2024 at 17:14 #6266John SaynorParticipantCan you please clarify something about Contactless in the evening peak? Is it the definitely the case that case that if I touch my first reader before 16:00 M-F, I will never be charged the peak fare – irrespective of how many times I pass in an out of gates en route after 16:00? For example, mainline to Euston, then tube then train to Sevenoaks (at least 4 intermediate touches).
Reason for question is that if you look up the Oval cash fare (single or day return) say from Beaconsfield to Sevenoaks, the last train that you can catch with an offpeak fare is given as the 14:09 from Beaconsfield. This because later trains connect into trains leaving London after 16:00. Same goes for other similar cross-London journeys starting on National Rail. I want to find out whether use of contactless overcomes this issue and is not affected by the departure time from the London terminus.
20/08/2024 at 17:36 #6267John SaynorParticipantCross-London journeys: There is one other thing that you could clarify, which is not completely clear from the train company information, and (possibly!) from your excellent advice columns. There appears to be a hard and fast TfL rule that if you travel inbound to Zone 1 between 16:00 and 19:00, you pay the contactless offpeak fare if your journey ends in Zone 1. If your journey passes through Zone 1 and out the other side to any station outside Zone one, and you touch in between 16:00 and 19:00, you are charged the peak fare. Correct? The same rules appear to apply to Oval cash fares for mainline journeys.
I think the rule should be made clearer: if travelling in the evening MF peak, the fare paid is determined by the time that you touch in PLUS your destination station. The peak/off peak price differences may only be a quid or two on the Tube, but are substantial once you get outside London.
In some cases, it will be cheaper to buy separate cash tickets or use two contactless cards to optimise the fares. Eg Beaconsfield to Whitechapel after 16:00 would save £4.40 with two cards for two separate contactless journeys
20/08/2024 at 18:05 #6268John SaynorParticipantOne more question re capping. The very detailed Chiltern website (https://www.chilternrailways.co.uk/paygexpansion) says:” Any pay as you go with contactless journeys made between 16:00 and 19:00 will still count towards an off-peak cap.”
So if I travel to London after 9:30 and come back between 16:00 and 19:00, my evening peak contactless fare is added to my earlier fares, but I only pay up to the Off Peak cap? But if so, what is the point of the Peak Cap?
So perhaps this is a mitigation of the problem caused by the introduction of the evening peak fares on National Rail where there were none before (all depending on the capping level)?
Again it would help if you could explain this in your info pages.
20/08/2024 at 18:34 #6269MikeModeratorJohn,
Thank you very much for this information. I’ll try and answer your questions as best I can.
1) Unless they have changed things then yes, the first touch in on a journey sets the rate for the whole journey.
2) Yes, if you pass through zone 1 and out the other side then a peak fare is payable, unless you’ve come from GWR stations from Iver westwards (including the branchlines) where it’s off-peak for any eastbound journey in the afternoon.
3) The fare-finder does specify whether the fare will be peak or off-peak in the afternoon. The times against the peak fare change depending on whether it is am only, am and pm, or pm only.
4) Correct, the off-peak cap applies at any time after 0930 and limits the effect of peak evening fares if earlier travel was off-peak after 0930. The anytime (or peak) cap protects revenue when the inbound journey is before 0930.Do come back to me if you get any further questions.
21/08/2024 at 15:02 #6274John SaynorParticipantThank you very much for that. Turns out that the off-peak cap doesn’t mitigate the ‘Evening Peak Trap’ for people who travel towards London offpeak. Looking at the live Chiltern rates, the offpeak caps are not generous and are typically the same as or more than the total of peak+offpeak single fares if no tube journey is involved. The off peak cap seems to be set at the offpeak travelcard rate on Chiltern.
However, there is another way of avoiding the Evening Peak Trap (aside from the Offpeak-with-travelcard option). This is to buy an old fashioned day return ticket from further back down the line!
For example: Sevenoaks-London Terminals, travelling out after 9:30ish and back 16:00-19:00:
Offpeak plus peak singles: £8 + £14.60 = £22.60 (cash or contactless)
Offpeak with Travelcard: £20.80 (cash)
Offpeak day return from Hildenborough £18.70 !Thus sadly, the evening peak fares further reduce the usefulness of the contactless system.
Btw on our line, many passengers can travel to London without the need for the Tube, thanks to the location of Charing Cross and the many main line stations that we can travel to. So there is less need for the Travelcard benefits.
21/08/2024 at 15:21 #6275John SaynorParticipantOne more question! With contactless, are there any restrictions or rules affecting the route that you can take (assuming that you only touch in and out once)? This is leaving aside the routing options enabled by the pink readers. For example, in the Zones, can I travel to an inner zone via one or more outer zones?
The question is in relation to Shoreham and Eynsford, where tickets are offered either ‘via Swanley’ or via ‘Any permitted’, which is via Sevenoaks at slightly higher cost. It is often quicker to go via Sevenoaks, changing trains. Brfares.com currently shows CPAY contactless fares routed ‘via Swanley’ – which I believe is a nonsense, since I didn’t think routing could be applied to contactless fares.
Given the number of loops in the railway network south of the Thames, one can think of lots of cases where one might want to do something like this.
21/08/2024 at 20:08 #6276MikeModeratorYou are correct that routeing cannot be applied unless a pink reader or out-of-station interchange is present to define the route taken. I can only speculate that the routeing mentioned on brfares.com is likely down to a misunderstanding on the part of the fare setter.
The other thing to understand is that traditional tickets are able to stop/start short, so in the case of a double back the fare needs to reflect the most expensive station. With PAYG you define the journey by your touches so you wouldn’t be able to exit at Sevenoaks without paying the fare to there.
04/09/2024 at 20:55 #6367Si HollettParticipantPhase 2a was announced today. Due to happen ‘next year’. Here’s the stations listed by line heading clockwise from 9 o’clock.
- Saunderton, Princes Risborough, Monks Risborough, Little Kimble, Aylesbury
- Great Missenden, Wendover, Stoke Mandeville, Aylesbury, Aylesbury Vale Parkway
- Luton, Leagrave, Harlington
- Welwyn North, Knebworth
- Watton-at-Stone
- Roydon, Harlow Mill, Harlow Town, Sawbridgeworth, Bishop’s Stortford, Stansted Mountfitchet, Stansted Airport
- Ingatestone, Chelmsford, Hatfield Peverel, Witham
- Billericay, Wickford, Rayleigh, Hockley, Rochford, Southend Airport, Prittlewell, Southend Victoria
- Woldingham, Hurst Green, Oxted, Lingfield, Dormans, East Grinstead
- Reigate
- Ashtead, Leatherhead, Box Hill & Westhumble, Dorking (Main)
05/09/2024 at 00:09 #6368Mike (admin)KeymasterCheers Si,
As it’s not until next year I’ll park this here. Quite a bit to do with the phase 1b go-live later this month.
05/09/2024 at 11:42 #6369Si HollettParticipantNo worries Mike – my post was purely putting the information in this thread, rather than a request that someone does something about it!
I can imagine phase 1b would be annoying to have to deal with (at least it has been publicised in good time and more widely than phase 1a which was just snuck in)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.