Mike (admin)

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 25 posts - 76 through 100 (of 377 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    Thanks for those links.

    The first point to note is that fares on the line to Reading and associated branches were set before Project Oval. This means that the fares data sent to TfL does not come directly from the NR fares database. It looks like GWR have increased some of the off-peak fares but this hasn’t been reflected in the TfL database. This was probably at the September fares change where off-peak caps were all increased by GWR. I’m confident that the fare shown by the fare finder is what will be charged.

    The Marlow issue is slightly different because the £22.00 fare is not tagged as being based on the contactless fare. I don’t know why the NR journey planner is not using the contactless fare when a fast train is being used. I’ll ask the question.

    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    Can you give me a link to where you’re seeing those National Rail fares. As far as contactless is concerned there is no difference between GWR and EL. The fares shown in fare finders driven by TfL open data are the ones that you should be charged by the PAYG system.

    in reply to: Paying balance without card #8641
    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    Hi Jonathan,

    That’s an interesting conundrum. I’m surprised TfL can’t/won’t stop the card even if it has a negative balance. Do you know whether the card had a deposit on it? If it did then you probably don’t owe TfL anything. If you haven’t already called the helpdesk then I would do so, and ask them exactly what TfL would like you to do. They’ll probably say that nothing can be done, but ask for a call reference and the person’s name, and that’s as much as you can do.

    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    Yes, I did. Beyond the Oyster zones the times allowed can get even longer, though they no longer relate to zones. The times for each journey are shown on the fare finder. I’ve put a comment on that video. Thanks for pointing me in the direction of it.

    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    I think Caterham to Tattenham Corner is probably the longest single zone journey outside of zones 1-2. I’m not sure how many people actually want to do it. When I last checked this many years ago it was posssible within about an hour, but timetables have probably changed since then.

    TfL do increase the time allowed for certain journeys where it isn’t possible to complete it in the standard time allowed. If they get reports of problems then they will likely look at increasing the time allowed, which is why I’m not convinced that many people actually make the journey, if any.

    If you do make the journey and it takes longer than 70 minutes then you’ll be charged two incomplete journeys. When you call the helpdesk they will refund all but the single zone charge, and it may kickstart a review.

    in reply to: Off-Peak NR Ticket on LU #8634
    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    Hi Miura,

    Banbury to London Underground zone 1 off-peak return is code WM which is unrestricted in the evening peak. It should be possible to view restrictions just before purchase online or at a ticket machine.

    in reply to: Off-Peak Day Travelcard #8627
    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    You’re not going mad. The ticket should include a link to https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/ticket-types/validity/b1/ on the National Rail website which confirms that it is only not valid between 0430-0929 on weekdays. Please complain to the companies who have told you otherwise.

    Also, if you have an Oyster card with your 16-25 railcard attached then the zone 1-6 off-peak cap is just £10.85, and that will be enforced throughout the afternoon peak without you worrying about it. Plus, if Harrow is the furthest out you go (ie zone 5) then the cap reduces to £10.15. It goes down to just £5.90 if all travel is just in zones 1-2.

    in reply to: TfL Go app to replace Oyster app #8625
    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    I reported this issue to TfL and with cooperation from Nick it has been fixed over the holiday period. Thanks for reporting it.

    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    I must admit, Feathers, that I share your concern. However, if these ‘interchanges’ are indeed being shown on car line diagrams then I think that potentially changes things. I’m intending making some requests later in the month and will include this case along with some others when I do.

    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    Harringay Green Lanes and Manor House have been shown as closeby for decades. There are even road signs pointing the way. It’s still not an OSI.

    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    Hi Michael,

    The dotted lines on the tube map are described as “less than a 10 minute walk” as opposed to an out-of-station-interchange, although the circle for the station does mean interchange, so I guess it’s a bit confusing. Unless they have added an OSI since the list was last published, using that interchange will result in two fares. Under normal circumstances there is little point in an OSI between those stations because just about any journey can be made without resorting to walking down the street.

    On the other matter, direct trains only run on a few days a year when engineering diversions mean trains pass through Primrose Hill. I don’t think TfL will entertain defining that as a default route when it isn’t available for most of the time. As someone who might benefit when it does happen, feel free to request that they consider it. It’s probably best to send an email or fill out a help an contact webform, but a phone call to the helpdesk might result in them taking details and calling you back later on.

    in reply to: Bond Street gate issues #8597
    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    I’m not sure that collecting contactless payments counts as a direct debit.

    in reply to: Bond Street gate issues #8595
    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    Hi Richard,

    So it’s been an eventful 7 days!

    I agree that it’s unlikely anyone else used your phone. If you feel inclined you might want to check google maps timeline (if you have it activated) as that may indicate where you were at 10:27. Another avenue may be to contact your mobile provider and see if they can assist. If your phone pinged a mast nowhere near Bond Street at that time then it would be pretty conclusive. The other thing to ask TfL is why the charges for the 1st one were not incomplete journeys. That points to something fishy to me.

    For the overcharges, I’d be asking my bank anyway, so that it’s logged that you’re actively investigating. They may even agree to refund the amount in the circumstances. TfL should only ever produce one transaction per day per card.

    in reply to: Bond Street gate issues #8592
    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    Hi Richard,

    You do seem to be a bit unlucky. On the first issue it does seem like there is a problem with one of the gates (or possibly a gateline) at that entrance. Do you habitually use the same gate? I’d be interested to see your journey history for the days in question. I’m aware of a couple of instances of gate clocks being out, both at London Bridge NR. On one occasion the time was correct but the date hadn’t changed on an exit gate meaning people touched out the day before they touched in. On the other one the time was about 5 minutes slow and someone was charged peak instead of off-peak. When confronted with evidence I did manage to get TfL to credit the difference for that customer.

    The second issue is way more serious. Does your account show just the one set of touches, both in journey history and payment history? Have TfL resolved the issue quickly? If it’s two identical charges at the same time then I’d be inclined to ask your bank whether they can see anything wrong at their end. If you can let me know exact details of when this happened I’ll ask some questions.

    in reply to: Evening peak on GTR #8589
    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    Hi Adam,

    Have you looked at evening peak fares from Reigate, or between East Grinstead and Woldingham?

    The whole thing is a bit of a mess. The reason Dorking is different to Reigate is because SWR set the fares from there even though half the trains are Southern.

    in reply to: Elizabeth Line fares #8575
    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    Hi Adam,

    Could you give an example. I’ve tried a few pairs and fares are displayed without problem.

    in reply to: TfL Go app to replace Oyster app #8569
    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    Well £1.75 is the maximum a bus journey will cost, but I know you didn’t mean that ;). Looks like they still have some work to do.

    in reply to: Project Oval #8532
    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    Interesting. Annoyingly I thought it was platform 0 there, not 5, but hopefully my email to GTR won’t confuse them too much.

    in reply to: Project Oval #8530
    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    This is very confusing. There are no cpay fares for Hertford North to Welwyn Garden City, possibly because they are both in the existing pre-oval contactless area. Also, isn’t there an issue at Stevenage where you have to exit and re-enter to get between platform 0 and the rest of the station? Do Hertford North trains ever use other than platform 0?

    in reply to: Project Oval #8528
    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    Hertford (North presumably) to Welwyn. Is the difference because there’s two ways to go and one is deemed more likely for North with the other winning for Garden City?

    in reply to: Project Oval #8526
    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    Cambridge? That isn’t part of this rollout?

    in reply to: Project Oval #8524
    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    Hi Adam,

    TfL don’t usually make new fares available early, unless it’s the annual fare change in March. They may be constrained by what has been agreed with the DfT. The data will be loaded onto the live system on December 7th, but even that doesn’t necessarily mean that it will be on the fare finder. Unless something goes wrong I would expect the fares to be available by December 14th. I will be keeping a close eye because there should also be a resolution to the Walthamstow Central issue at the same time.

    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    Ah, I understand now. In which case, I don’t think there is a free way of breaking the OSI, unless you are going to cap anyway so a touch on a bus is effectively free. Have you managed to get a refund?

    I think the number of people who exit and enter the station within 10 minutes after fulfilling their reason for going there is probably quite small.

    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    I take it that you aren’t complaining about being saved a complete single journey charge?

    I’m not familiar with Oxford Circus. Is it just one entry and one exit gateline, or does the entry gateline also do exits? If the latter then you may be able to enter, exit and enter again. You could also touch on a bus, albeit with a charge, so I realise that that option won’t appeal to you. If you end up with a here to here journey, and two maximum fares, then the helpdesk will certainly resolve that.

    The reason it is there is to assist passengers who want to interchange but end up at the exit area with nowhere else to go.

    in reply to: Amex down for contactless payments 21/10/2025 #8504
    Mike (admin)
    Keymaster

    I think the fact that most of the Gpay issues will have happened after the AWS outage started probably meant that some staff did jump to the wrong conclusion. In fact, if I hadn’t been aware of an issue on Sunday and had a problem on the Monday morning, I’d have jumped to the same conclusion myself.

    As to what caused the issue itself, you’ll not get more than they’ve said. It was probably an issue at TfL’s end, but maybe caused by a change implimented by either GPay or Amex, that TfL hadn’t properly understood or wasn’t properly explained to them. As long as no-one is out of pocket then it’s just one of those things that happen occasionally. And I say that as someone who loves to know exactly what happened and gets frustrated when people won’t explain.

Viewing 25 posts - 76 through 100 (of 377 total)